Star Wars, remixing, and the "Vaderesque" IP regime
Writing in The Washington Post this morning, Stanford law professor (and creator of the Creative Commons alternative licensing regime) Larry Lessig comments on recently announced plans by Lucasfilm to make the Star Wars movie franchise available for "remixing" by fans and independent artists. Identifying the business rationale for remixing and noting "[a] dark force" within the prevailing intellectual property regime limiting its realization, he predicts what he frames as an inevitable future paradigm of greater consumer control and participation over digital content.
The business rationale is straightforward:
The business rationale is straightforward:
Turning consumers into creators is the latest fad among companies scrambling for new profits in the digital age. How better to revive a 30-year-old series than by enlisting armies of kids to make the content interesting again? These traditionally protective commercial entities are creating "hybrids" -- leveraging free labor to make their commercial properties more valuable.Professor Lessig notes, however, that "[a] dark force . . . has influenced Lucasfilm's adoption of Eyespot's technology."
A careful reading of Lucasfilm's terms of use show that in exchange for the right to remix Lucasfilm's creativity, the remixer has to give up all rights to what he produces. In particular, the remixer grants to Lucasfilm the "exclusive right" to the remix -- including any commercial rights -- for free . . . . The remixer becomes the sharecropper of the digital age.Finally, Professor Lessig's prediction:
. . . .
[T]here is a deep divide between those who believe that obsessive control is the hybrid's path to profit and those who believe that freer access will build stronger, more profitable ties. Predictably, on the Vader-side of control is often a gaggle of lawyers who continue to act as though nothing interesting has changed in copyright law since the time of John Philip Sousa. These lawyers counsel their clients that control is always better. They ridicule efforts to strike a different balance with the army of creators being called into the service of their clients.
A decade from now, this Vaderesque advice will look as silly as the advice lawyers gave the recording industry a decade ago. New entrants, not as obsessed with total control, will generate radically more successful remix markets. The people who spend hundreds of hours creating this new work will flock to places and companies where their integrity as creators is respected. As every revolution in democratizing technologies since the beginning of time has demonstrated, victory goes to those who embrace with respect the new creators.
Written By:DaveHughes On July 12, 2007 1:41 PM
Post A Comment / Question
Lessig is right, of course. He has long seen the self-defeating protectionism by the control-freaks of the media industries.
The ability of individuals, with their personal - and affordable - computers, linked to the Internet, has opened vast possibilities for creative people - hitherto having been only Consumers, to become creative Producers.
And he sees the lawyers advising a continuation of a zero-sum game of singular winners and all other as losers, rather than a fully cooperative 'shared' wealth system made possible by the Net.
Digital serfs indeed. And the recently revised copyright law has continued our Feudal system of rights and priveleges. With lawyers always being on the side of the Golden Rulers - those who have the Gold, rules.